![[Search]](/static/images/search.gif){kind=small}
![[A-Z Index]](/static/images/az.gif){kind=small}
![[Contact]](/static/images/contact.gif){kind=small}
![[University of Cambridge]](/static/images/identifier2.gif){kind=small}
![[Talks.cam]](/static/images/talkslogosmall.gif)
Stephan Hartmann (Tilburg University)
Thursday 26 February 2009, 16:30-18:00
Consensus and disagreement in science
- đ¤ Speaker: Stephan Hartmann (Tilburg University)
- đ Date & Time: Thursday 26 February 2009, 16:30 - 18:00
- đ Venue: Seminar Room 2, History and Philosophy of Science, Department of
Abstract
There is a considerable amount of disagreement amongst scientists. They disagree on methodological questions regarding the virtues of a good theory as well as on conclusions drawn from observed data. But the domain of disagreement extends beyond purely academic questions: policy recommendations based on scientific theories and the distribution of research funds are typical examples of socially relevant areas of dissent in science. In many cases, the initial disagreement eventually leads to a consensus. This raises several questions: When is it rational for scientists to disagree? How should a group of scientists proceed to reach a decision? Which factors facilitate a consensus? The answers to these questions will surely depend on the specific case under investigation. I will argue, however, that formal methods can also be used to shed some light on these questions.
Series This talk is part of the Departmental Seminars in History and Philosophy of Science series.
Included in Lists
- All Talks (aka the CURE list)
- Cambridge talks
- Departmental Seminars in History and Philosophy of Science
- Department of History and Philosophy of Science
- Featured lists
- hc446
- History and Philosophy of Science long list
- jer64's list
- List 1
- Philosophy Events
- Seminar Room 2, History and Philosophy of Science, Department of
- Trust & Technology Initiative - interesting events
- yk449
Note: Ex-directory lists are not shown.