BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Talks.cam//talks.cam.ac.uk//
X-WR-CALNAME:Talks.cam
BEGIN:VEVENT
SUMMARY:Who gets to do research? -  Equity in STEMM viewed through a fundi
 ng lens - Prof. Rachel Oliver (Department of Materials Science &amp\; Meta
 llurgy\, University of Cambridge)
DTSTART:20210610T130000Z
DTEND:20210610T140000Z
UID:TALK159991@talks.cam.ac.uk
CONTACT:Lingtao Kong
DESCRIPTION:Research grants from United Kingdom Research and Innovation (U
 KRI) are the lifeblood of our research ecosystem in science\, engineering\
 , technology\, maths and medicine (STEMM).  These grants pay the salaries 
 of researchers\, and allow academics to buy consumables\, equipment and ac
 cess to top notch facilities.  Without money\, it is very hard to make sci
 ence and innovation happen\, and those who lose out in the hypercompetitiv
 e struggle for grants find it much harder to progress up the research care
 er ladder.  Winning funding for a fellowship is often an unspoken prerequi
 site for getting a permanent post at a University\, and winning grants is 
 vital to promotion within the permanent academic career pathway. \n\nRecen
 t data analyses released by UKRI and also by the Engineering and Physical 
 Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) reveal startling inequities in the distr
 ibution of research funding.  In considering the impact of gender on grand
  application and award rates\, EPSRC have claimed for several years that w
 omen were just as likely to be awarded grants as men.  However\, this is o
 nly true if the values of grants won by men and women are ignored.  Consid
 ering the largest grants provided by EPSRC\, men are more than twice as li
 kely to receive funding as women\, and in every one of the last 12 years\,
  the largest grant awarded by EPSRC has always gone to a male investigator
 .  This glass ceiling preventing women from succeeding in engineering and 
 the physical sciences at the highest level drives the gender pay gap\, red
 uces women’s influence in strategic decision making and deprives early c
 areer women of relatable role models at the top of their field.\n\nThe sit
 uation for Black researchers and those of other minoritised ethnicities is
  even more dismaying.   Data from EPSRC routinely show lower award rates a
 nd lower average amounts per awarded grant for scientists of minoritised e
 thnicity as compared to white scientists.  The available EPSRC data aggreg
 ate the experiences of scientists of different ethnicities\, and fail to a
 ccount for the specific barriers faced by Black scientists.  However\, UKR
 I have recently released additional data which (whilst they do not address
  STEMM specifically) show that in 2018-2019 only 10 Black Principle Invest
 igators (PIs) were awarded grants\, across the whole of UKRI.  In the same
  period nearly 2000 white PIs received grants.  These data are symptomatic
  of systematic racism in UK academia\, which is also borne out by narrativ
 e reports of the experience of Black researchers and others of minoritised
  ethnicity.\n\nWe all have a part to play in addressing the barriers faced
  by women and researchers of minoritised ethnicity\, researchers who are d
 isabled or LGBTQ+ and in particular researchers who fall in the intersecti
 ons of these groups who may confront an accumulation of barriers\, and abo
 ut whom data remains scarce.  Many minoritised researchers report that lac
 k of mentoring\, sponsorship or institutional support within their Univers
 ities affects their progress through grant funding processes\, and their b
 roader career progression.  These issues can and should be addressed at a 
 local level\, whilst privileged researchers who hold grants and hence powe
 r within our systems should press funders for more radical change\, addres
 sing the cycles of inequality we currently condone.  \n\nAddressing these 
 issues is fundamentally a question of fairness to our minoritised colleagu
 es\, but it is worthwhile to also note that there is increasing evidence t
 hat more diverse teams outperform homogeneous ones.  Hence\, recognising a
 nd taking responsibility for addressing the inequities in our current syst
 ems\, has the potential to benefit all scientists\, and also broader socie
 ty.\n
LOCATION:Zoom meeting (Meeting ID: 937 3157 5068\, Passcode: 994936)
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
