BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Talks.cam//talks.cam.ac.uk//
X-WR-CALNAME:Talks.cam
BEGIN:VEVENT
SUMMARY:Overview and Q&amp\;A of Topping's recommendations on the grace to
  cut off ties to fossil fuel companies - Manar Alsaif\, UoC
DTSTART:20240424T120000Z
DTEND:20240424T130000Z
UID:TALK213286@talks.cam.ac.uk
CONTACT:Anna Walczyk
DESCRIPTION:Lunch will be provided from 1pm. The talk will start at 1.15pm
 .\nExecutive summary\nThe University has recognised the urgency of the cli
 mate emergency and taken action to demonstrate leadership. This includes d
 ecisions to divest from fossil fuels in the endowment\, commit to science-
 based targets\, launch Cambridge Zero and align sources of funding with th
 e University’s own ambition.\n\nThis report has been commissioned in res
 ponse to a Grace calling on the University to cease collaboration of all f
 orms with companies carrying out or facilitating exploration for new fossi
 l fuel reserves\, building new fossil fuel infrastructure or retaining mem
 bership with trade bodies lobbying against climate policy.\n\nThe report r
 eviews the internal and external contexts of the climate crisis and the Un
 iversity’s role in teaching and research and makes recommendations for a
 n amended form of the Grace to mitigate risks and pursue opportunities con
 sistent with its charitable mission.\n\nThe Paris Agreement concluded at C
 OP21 defined international collective ambition and laid out the architectu
 re for action along three main tracks – mitigation\, adaptation and resi
 lience\, and climate finance.\n\nProgress to date has been woefully slow i
 n all three tracks – emissions continue to rise\, extreme weather events
  increase in frequency and severity faster than communities can adapt and 
 international finance flows need to increase by a factor of five by 2030.\
 n\nThe technologies needed to transition to a net-zero energy system are l
 argely understood and pathways exist in all sectors. Renewable energy gene
 ration and battery costs have declined dramatically and the tipping point 
 of cost parity has now been passed in electricity systems and electric veh
 icles (EVs). These technologies are now being deployed exponentially at a 
 rate which is on track or ahead of what is needed to reach net zero by 205
 0.\n\nIn other sectors clean technology options remain costlier than curre
 nt high-emission options so the focus is on driving deployment up and cost
 s down to reach the cost tipping point this decade. Two keystone technolog
 ies are particularly important: green hydrogen and alternative proteins. T
 he Breakthrough Agenda\, launched at COP26\, is an international collabora
 tive initiative to drive progress in many of these sectors.\n\nProgress in
  adaptation and resilience has been even slower. The burden of climate cha
 nge falls disproportionately on those who have done the least to cause it\
 , particularly citizens of emerging and developing economies. The Sharm el
  Sheikh Adaptation Agenda\, launched at COP27\, provides a first practical
  architecture for the deployment of solutions at scale.\n\nClimate finance
  lags way behind the levels necessary to invest in the transition to a res
 ilient net-zero future. After years of excessive focus on one important ye
 t small part of the solution [the $100bn per annum promised by rich countr
 ies]\, COP26 and COP27 produced a set of initiatives which now have create
 d a much clearer roadmap of reforms across public and private\, internatio
 nal and domestic finance needed to deliver the $2.4tr per annum by 2030 in
  emerging and developing economies\, excluding China.\n\nThe University re
 ceives relatively small amounts of funding from industrial partners\, amou
 nting to 5.1% of all research/philanthropy funding. At an average of £3.3
  million per year over the last 6 years\, fossil fuel funding amounts to 0
 .4% of research/philanthropy funding and 0.1% of total University income.\
 n\nThe University has a broad range of teaching and world-class research c
 ontributing to addressing the climate crisis. Recommendation 1 is to focus
  on the opportunity for a major fundraising push to bolster the University
 ’s position as a global leader in tackling the climate crisis.\n\nCBELA 
 reviews detailed due diligence in deciding whether or not to accept fundin
 g from fossil fuel companies. Currently BP and Shell are rated amber\, eve
 n though due diligence finds that no fossil fuel companies are aligned wit
 h the University’s level of ambition.\n\nThe design of the CBELA decisio
 n-making process lacks clarity and transparency. Recommendation 2 is to si
 gnificantly simplify the CBELA process by referring to credible third-part
 y benchmarks\, whilst retaining discretion for exceptional circumstances.\
 n\nRecommendation 2 suggests application of the SBTi definition of a fossi
 l fuel company. Wholly or partially-owned subsidiaries of fossil fuel comp
 anies should be considered on their own merits\, so that if they are focus
 sed on clean technology they should be seen as valid funding partners.\n\n
 The Grace as written would have serious negative consequences for academic
  freedom and freedom of speech\, by censoring who academics are allowed to
  work with. Recommendation 3 limits the application of the Grace to resear
 ch/philanthropic funding only and does not extend restrictions to other fo
 rms of collaboration.\n\nThe Grace as written extends the consideration of
  climate alignment to many more companies. Recommendation 4 retains the na
 rrow scope of fossil fuel companies for the CBELA process whilst suggestin
 g a timely extension of alignment activities to all companies according to
  a plan to be produced within 18 months.
LOCATION: LT6\, First floor Baker building\, Dept of engineering\, Cambrid
 ge university\, Trumpington street\, CB2 1PZ
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
