BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Talks.cam//talks.cam.ac.uk//
X-WR-CALNAME:Talks.cam
BEGIN:VEVENT
SUMMARY: CHSH Bell Inequalities made simple(r):  Linear functions\, loopho
 les\, and how to post-select data without causing one. - Dan Browne (UCL)
DTSTART:20110203T141500Z
DTEND:20110203T151500Z
UID:TALK28120@talks.cam.ac.uk
CONTACT:Ashley Montanaro
DESCRIPTION:This work began as an investigation into whether the cosmetic 
 similarities between Bell inequality experiments and measurement-based qua
 ntum computing might reflect a deeper connection. What we find is that the
  ``computational viewpoint'' is remarkably well-suited to the study of CHS
 H-type Bell inequalities\, and provides a very simple way of characterisin
 g the correlations permitted by local hidden variable (LHV) theories. Whil
 e mathematically equivalent to previous work (see Werner and Wolf's paper 
 cited below for the original derivation of this set of correlations) this 
 provides a cleaner and simpler operational definition\, which\, in particu
 lar\, make ''loopholes'' easy to characterise.\n\nLoopholes in Bell inequa
 lity experiments arise when imperfections in the experimental setup mean t
 hat it does not concord precisely with the assumptions under which Bell in
 equalities are derived. Often those flaws mean that local hidden variable 
 theories would be able to access correlations which in a strict Bell setup
  would be forbidden to them\, and hence a quantum mechanical reproduction 
 of that correlation  cannot refute local hidden variable theories - a "loo
 phole" in the argument.\n\nThe simplicity of the characterisation of the L
 HV correlations in our model allow us to pin down explicit mechanisms by w
 hich loopholes arise. For example\, a well-known loophole is the detector 
 loophole\, where\, due to inefficient detectors\, data must be  post-selec
 ted - only when both detectors fire can the data be used. The origin of th
 e detector loophole can be cleanly understood within our framework\, and c
 onstructing LHV models which fake an imperfect quantum detector while maxi
 mally violating Bell inequalities  (to the bounds previously identified by
  Garg and Mermin) is straightforward. We see that there are many ways in w
 hich post-selection of data can cause loopholes.\n\nIn addition to providi
 ng a simpler (and quantum information friendly) way to understand previous
  results (hence "for beginners")\, we can use our model for new investigat
 ions. For example\, we can characterise post-selection strategies where no
  loopholes arise - and consider the effect of this post-selection upon qua
 ntum correlations. We find that there is a broad family of non-loophole in
 ducing post-selection strategies which one can adopt. Surprisingly\, we se
 e that while not expanding the region of correlations accessible by LHV th
 eories\, such post-selection can expand the region of correlations accessi
 ble by quantum theories.  In other words\, performing this post-selection 
 allows quantum measurements to achieve correlations which were previously 
 impossible\, without creating a loophole. This effect becomes apparent in 
 the multi-partite setting (the smallest example we have is for 6 qubits)\,
  and does not enhance the bi-partite CHSH inequality\, therefore\, it is c
 urrently unclear whether this post-selection will aid current Bell inequal
 ity experiments. However\, the larger multi-partite region now includes ne
 w types of quantum correlation previously overlooked in the Bell inequalit
 y setting\, most notably (post-selected simulations of) the adaptive measu
 rements which arise in measurement-based quantum computation. We expect th
 at these results will give new insights into measurement-based quantum com
 putation and related areas and will be valuable in the search for informat
 ion theoretic characterisations of the set of quantum correlations which g
 o beyond the bi-partite setting.\n\nThese results were developed in collab
 oration with Matty Hoban.\n\nPrevious work in this direction:\nJ. Anders a
 nd D.E. Browne\, arXiv:0805.1002\;\nM. Hoban et al\, arXiv:1009.5213\n\nMa
 in reference for these results:\nM. Hoban and D. E. Browne\, in preparatio
 n (hopefully on the arxiv very soon)\n\nOther reading:\nMulti-partite Bell
  inequalities\, Werner and Wolf\, Phys. Rev. A 64\, 032112 (2001)\;\nDetec
 tor Loophole\, Garg and Mermin\, Phys. Rev. D 35\, 3831–3835 (1987)
LOCATION:MR13\, Centre for Mathematical Sciences
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
